Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
CAN CLOTHING RETAILERS
GET BACK IN FASHION?
A depressed consumer environment in South Africa has resulted in clothing retail shares trading sideways since 2014 and underperforming the market – at Sanlam Private Wealth, we’ve been highly selective in our exposure to the sector in our houseview portfolio over the past decade. However, more palatable valuations have resulted in some clothing retail shares now starting to look attractive. While we certainly won’t be taking an aggressive stance, we may consider adding to the sector. Our preferred names are Pepkor, which we already own, and The Foschini Group (TFG).
Over the past two decades, the ‘big 5’ listed South African clothing retailers – Woolworths, Truworths, Mr Price, TFG and Pepkor – have dominated the sector, capturing a greater share of apparel retail sales every year. Accounting for nearly 70% of South African apparel and footwear sales, these groups have – over the long term – boasted high margins and healthy profits as they’ve penetrated the informal market, consolidated smaller outfits and grown space at a rapid rate.
The South African clothing retail industry is a traditionally tough space in which to operate. Over the past few years, competition within the sector has been muted, exacerbated by the closure of local stalwarts Stuttafords and Edcon in 2017 and 2020 respectively. The main winners after the latter’s demise were TFG, Mr Price and Pepkor. In recent years we’ve seen Pick n Pay Clothing and UNIQ (a division of Shoprite) enter the market to challenge the incumbents.
At the same time the entry of international fashion retailers into South Africa has had a significant impact. The likes of H&M, Zara and Cotton On have found good early traction on our shores. While these foreign retailers have thus far failed to steal significant market share, the growing presence of international retailers shouldn’t be ignored.
The major bane for South African retailers is consumers’ declining disposable income, aggravated by the weak rand, which has materially increased the selling prices of imported clothing. This, together with our large income inequality and high unemployment rate, has resulted in poor volume growth in terms of clothing units sold over the past few years. In analysing household consumption patterns, it’s clear that consumers are having to make trade-offs in their monthly spending, reallocating spend towards segments like transport and electricity.
Changing consumer behaviour poses another challenge. Most retailers swear by the maxim ‘the customer is always right’ – and a combination of trends, disruptions and shifting behaviours is currently enabling consumers to influence the sector. The expectations of Gen Z and millennial shoppers are vastly different from those of previous generations, and then we have the digital natives, Gen Alpha, who were raised in an online world.
As consumer expectations evolve, retailers in the clothing sector are under more pressure than ever before to remain relevant as their connected, sophisticated and well-informed customers seek enhanced experiences, increased transparency, choice and sustainability, as well as a greater focus on convenience. They want discount pricing and fast shipping, but they are also willing to pay more for fashion brands they identify with.
Traditionally, the success of the clothing retailers was premised on being able to bring the product to their customers through store expansion. As internet and smartphone penetration increases, this operating model is coming under threat as barriers to entry in the sector decrease, while years of market consolidation have left fewer assets available to buy, limiting growth via acquisitions.
Since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, online shopping has gained in popularity, as evidenced by the success of retailers such as Checkers Sixty60 and Chinese e-commerce giant Shein, and the recent announcement that Amazon would enter our market in 2024. While these businesses don’t all form part of the clothing retail sector, their rise does point to a few challenges for the industry.
One of these is that the route to market for clothing retailers is no longer hindered by the ability to access capital to expand their store base or, indeed, the need for physical space to sell product. The emergence of the likes of Shein and Superbalist (part of the Naspers-owned Takealot Group) indicates a strong appetite for an alternative method of shopping to traditional stores.
Online shopping has led to increased competition in terms of accessing consumers’ disposable income, not only for international players but also for small businesses and manufacturers to sell their products directly to consumers. Furthermore, it has created price discovery within the market and increased promotional activity, putting pressure on margins.
Online sales have also brought about a change in the way retailers trade, from both the back end and their physical stores. Optimising inventory management and efficient delivery now require more sophisticated IT systems as stores are used to fulfil online orders. We expect higher-end retailers to move towards fewer, but fancier stores, providing consumers with a more sensory overall shopping experience.
While we haven’t delved into the cost of online shopping from a business perspective, and while the pace of online sales growth will be dictated by consumers, it does bring about economies of scale for clothing retailers. An online platform can accommodate significant growth in revenue without the incremental capital expenditure required in traditional store roll-out. Retailers can also showcase their full product range in a single place for the convenience of shoppers.
From an investment point of view, clothing retail shares are now starting to look more interesting – they are pricing for a poor operating environment to continue, led by loadshedding and pressure on consumer disposable income, resulting in depressed valuations.
We are, however, of the view that investors should remain highly selective within the sector and look to identify market share gainers over time. We like the business model of TFG. It operates in South Africa, the UK and Australia, as well as across the low-, middle- and upper-income segments, and has integrated manufacturing capabilities that enable it to meet changing consumer trends faster.
An exciting development in the world of TFG was the launch in February this year of its Bash online platform – a highly proactive move relative to competitors. Given that developed markets currently enjoy a higher percentage of revenue from online sales than South Africa, TFG is in our view building this capability ahead of the need in this country, ensuring it is well positioned to compete in the evolving local retail landscape.
We will continue to keep a close eye on the TFG valuation, looking for the correct entry point to add to client portfolios.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
Your wealth plan is designed with you in mind. Your financial reality, aspirations and risk profile.
Carl Schoeman has spent 22 years in Investment Management.
Have a question for Carl?
South Africa
South Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStarRest of Africa
Sanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth MauritiusGlobal
Global Investment SolutionsCopyright 2019 | All Rights Reserved by Sanlam Private Wealth | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (FAIS) | Principles and Practices of Financial Management (PPFM). | Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) | Conflicts of Interest Policy | Privacy Statement
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
MANDATORY DISCLOSURE
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.