Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
2020: A watershed
for the world
Alwyn van der Merwe
Director of Investments
Dec 09, 2020
It was a year of extremes in financial markets. Equity prices collapsed spectacularly and then recovered in grand fashion. Within the asset class, some sectors became very expensive, and some sold off as if those counters would not survive the economic fallout. Unlike during the global financial crisis in 2007/08, however, economic authorities did everything they could to counter the negative impact of COVID-19 on economic activity levels. At a societal level, the pandemic accelerated developing social and behavioural trends that are now likely to become entrenched in societies the world over.
At the time of writing, we have passed 63 million reported cases of COVID-19 globally, and around 1.46 million people have died. The world is now experiencing a second wave of infections during the northern hemisphere winter, but while it continues to rage in the US, its spread in Europe has slowed down. It appears the only way to eradicate, or at least contain, this virus is with a vaccine and we’ve certainly had some encouraging news on this front of late.
The UK was the first country to approve the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine with a view to starting inoculations as soon as mid-December. Pfizer/BioNTech is set to submit an emergency use authorisation request to the US for their vaccine on 10 December, followed by Moderna on 18 December. In the US, vaccines are likely to be rolled out from mid- to end-December.
This virus will unfortunately not allow itself to be dictated to by a calendar, and we’ll likely continue to see its impact in many regions in the first half of 2021. However, it wouldn’t be far-fetched to assume a gradual post-vaccine normalisation of economic and social activity in advanced economies over the second half of 2021 and into the first half of 2022. In other regions, a return to normal will likely start to take shape through 2022 and well into 2023.
COVID-19 left deep wounds in financial markets. Globally, equity prices collapsed by 34% in dollar terms from late February to 23 March as investors panicked out of equities amid balance sheet and earnings uncertainty. South African equities also sold off aggressively and lost 32% in rand terms – an eye-watering 47% in US dollar terms. Locally listed property lost 50% of its value within a month after the sector had already been on the slide for 18 months.
Usually, bonds act as a shock absorber during a crisis. Investors at first didn’t buy the sovereign bond thesis and initially, US sovereign bond prices came under pressure. However, when investors were eventually assured that the US Federal Reserve was prepared to buy these instruments, bond prices did exactly what they normally do in a crisis – they appreciated, despite the fact that bond yields were already trading at historically very low levels or, conversely, very high prices.
Unfortunately for South African bond investors, local bonds were not treated as safe-haven assets. Investors’ risk-off mentality led to an aggressive sell-off of the rand, cast more doubt on South Africa’s ability to service its debt, and ultimately provided a trigger for sellers to exit the asset class. The yield of local 10-year government bonds spiked from 8.73% to 12.11%.
However, another safe haven came to the fore. The gold price in dollar terms displayed a price pattern similar to that of global bonds. Initially, the gold price lost 11% during the financial assets sell-off, but then made a spectacular recovery, gaining 38% from the lows recorded in March until it peaked in early August.
These extreme price movements didn’t happen in a vacuum. The impact of the virus on the mobility of people had dire consequences for economic activity both locally and globally. Certain industries came under severe pressure. Workers lost their jobs – in the US, the unemployment rate exceeded the 20% level – causing economic activity levels to collapse. In South Africa, we experienced a collapse of economic activity of 51% on the seasonally adjusted annualised rate in the second quarter.
The impact on economic activity triggered an extremely aggressive policy reaction from economic authorities, ranging from measures to create liquidity, dropping the price of money or interest rates that were already at historically low levels, and massive fiscal stimulation that benefited and supported individuals, companies and other institutions. On the back of this ‘no holding back’ approach by authorities, we’ve seen a highly aggressive or V-shaped response in high street (economic activity) and ‘Wall Street’ or financial markets.
As mentioned, it was certainly a year of extremes – an extremely sharp fall in equity prices was followed by an equally astounding recovery. Companies seen as gaining from increased online or digital activity enjoyed exceptionally strong price behaviour. The contrary was also true, however. Assets regarded as victims of the virus were sold off and displayed dismal price performance. The net result? Unprecedented disparity in the performance of the various financial assets and asset classes. Perhaps one of the best illustrations of this trend is the market capitalisation of electric motor manufacturer Tesla relative to the cumulative market capitalisation of 12 global motor manufacturers:
Market cap of Tesla versus 12 global automakers (US$bn)
The Nasdaq Index, which is dominated by information technology stocks, has recorded a return of 38% since 1 January compared to the 13% return by the broadly defined S&P 500 Index over the same period. The trend over the past 11 years was one where value stocks were ignored by investors, while shares with higher earnings visibility and better growth stories associated with them received the most investor attention.
This trend accelerated in 2020, as the liquidity created by authorities landed in the hands of non-professional investors, who were very happy to speculate on these ‘story’ shares. These speculative views were vindicated as the ‘bets’ paid off for investors. We’re of course not for one moment arguing that the so-called FAANG companies (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Alphabet, formerly known as Google) are not real and large global businesses, and highly profitable. Millions, if not billions of people use their products and services every day. But the fact remains that the valuation gap between popular growth shares and unloved value shares opened further to levels rarely witnessed in the past.
The South African equity market also acted rather schizophrenically in the initial recovery. Gold shares responded aggressively to the higher gold price, as many of the South African gold mines are marginal operations and the higher gold price would logically lead to exponential growth in profits. Other mining shares also performed admirably in the initial recovery. However, so-called SA Inc shares didn’t share in the recovery – many investors questioned the financial viability of these shares given the dire state of the local economy. Concerns about our economy also alienated foreign investors, who were sellers of both local equities and bonds.
Just as we thought the trend was entrenched for the year, however, positive news on vaccine roll-outs presumably acted as a catalyst to strengthen interest in risky assets, particularly unloved assets. Value shares started to dictate the pace of price recovery within the equity market. Locally, the SA Inc universe recovered rapidly, while selected safe-haven assets were sold to acquire these shares. Gold stocks were the biggest victim. The changes happened unannounced, and the quantum was material. In fact, investors were either positioned well and benefited from the extreme momentum change, or they were incorrectly positioned and were left flailing in its wake.
In the final analysis, a few macro themes likely to play themselves out over the medium term have started to gain momentum. The increased trade tension between the US and China, which was very prominent in the Trump era, will remain a reality and is likely to spread wider as China seeks to grow its international standing. The consequence will be potentially lower international trade over time, with associated negative economic consequences.
Inequality both within and between countries was pushed to the forefront sharply during 2020. It’s also not limited to wealth and income – a trend that’s quickly emerging as a political force globally, is the intergenerational gap. Addressing this issue is likely to put more pressure on tax revenue in future. Lastly, the high valuations of technology companies come with a ‘story’ – one of rapid technological change that’s both positive and disruptive, but which results in both winners and losers in not only the tech sector, but also the wider global economy.
It was indeed an eventful year, with significant volatility on the financial markets, as well as extreme challenges for humankind in general. It might well be remembered as a watershed year, with many softer trends gaining momentum. From an investment perspective, however, it may be surprising to learn that while the past year was certainly unusual, it wasn’t all that uncommon. Over the past 100 years of investment history, financial market collapses of this magnitude are not unprecedented. They don’t occur regularly, however, even though the meltdown of 2008 is still fresh in our memories.
We therefore trust that ongoing support from authorities and the successful roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines will provide the backdrop for continued global economic recovery and appreciation of financial assets, offering investors a just return for investing in these assets in 2021.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
are they a good investment?
The great lockdown:
one year on
Head of Equities
IHG: focus on
quality pays off
Sanlam Active UK Fund
BUDGET 2021: THE RIGHT INTENT,
BUT RISKS ABOUND
Investment Economist at Sanlam Investments
INVESTING IN 2021:
WHAT TO EXPECT
Sanlam Private Wealth
MINING: IS THE
THROUGH THE HYPE
Head of Equities
Jack is back – business
as usual for Alibaba?
Global Equity Analyst, Sanlam UK
South AfricaSouth Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStar
Rest of AfricaSanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth Mauritius
GlobalGlobal Investment Solutions
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.