Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
Investing in SA:
are we nearing a tipping point?
Sanlam Private Wealth
Oct 03, 2019
We heard from our CEO, Carl Roothman, that the major forces currently impacting global financial markets will of necessity filter through to emerging market asset prices – including our own – and some of these unpredictable upheavals may well result in game-changing shifts in the investment landscape. In the UK, the extremely messy divorce of that country from the European Union continues to have a ripple effect on economic activity in Europe. Across the Atlantic, US president Donald Trump’s ongoing trade spat with China is having a significant impact on the earnings prospects of companies in the firing line – and there’s no indication that the dispute will be resolved any time soon. His potential impeachment of course also won’t be doing the US markets any favours.
Another major theme currently impacting investment decisions globally is the dismal returns of government bonds, which have traditionally been viewed as a shock absorber providing protection against equity market volatility. Around 25% of bonds currently being issued are all but guaranteed to lose money for investors. And then there’s the so-called inverted yield curve in the US, which occurs when short-term bonds yield more than long-term ones – an inversion in the curve has traditionally indicated an impending recession in the US.
Against this turbulent global backdrop, what are investors to make of the political and economic realities we’re grappling with back home? Leading political economy analyst Daniel Silke told us the ‘Ramaphoria’ that had gripped our nation after the election of President Cyril Ramaphosa has given way to ‘Ramareality’ as the enormity of the challenges he faces has slowly sunk in.
The legacy our president has inherited is decidedly gloomy: mismanagement, graft and corruption, an economy that hasn’t grown by more than 2% since 2013, business confidence which is at its lowest ebb since 1999, and 10 years of market-unfriendly policy-making. Most concerning is the level of unemployment, translating into social dislocation, which plays out in crime, gender-based violence and attacks on foreigners.
The tough decisions President Ramaphosa needs to make to implement the reforms necessary to turn our ailing economy around are well-known. The big question is: given the political constraints and internal rivalry within the ANC, will he be able to consolidate the power he needs within his own party to make the necessary policy adjustments?
Another of our speakers, political analyst Ralph Mathekga, had a similar view. According to him, with multiple agendas in the ANC leadership and no single, coherent source of power, national priorities are becoming residues of the battle of the political elite. We’re seeing ‘politicking without focus on policy’, and reforms are taking place too slowly because there’s little consensus among our country’s leaders – our policies are increasingly a compromise between warring groups.
South Africa is facing a ‘crisis of democracy’ – our democracy is not legitimate, since it isn’t seen to be reaching out to all our country’s citizens and meeting their needs. When people feel they’re being left behind, they become disenchanted, start to pull back from the democratic process, and focus on alternative means of engagement. The result is the emergence of populism away from the political centre and a fractured society in which various groups attempt to bargain with the system – in essence, a rent-seeking society.
So what does all this mean? Is South Africa edging towards a tipping point, as some observers have suggested? Our speakers all agreed that we’re not there yet – we’re not yet at a threshold or a point of no return in our country.
In Ralph’s view, much-needed reforms are likely to continue, albeit at a slow pace, and most will be induced by some sense of urgency, such as the Eskom debt crisis. One positive trend is that certain economic and political fundamentals are now being strongly challenged. For instance, there’s an increased awareness within the ANC that the party’s ‘moral authority’ can no longer be rooted in its liberation history. In an effort to increase its own legitimacy to govern, the ANC is now far more willing to consult and seek consensus beyond its own leadership in broader society than was traditionally the case.
Daniel was of the opinion that the political dynamics to keep our president on his toes, the support of the business community, as well as his own efforts to change thinking within his party, are slowly starting to have an impact. In his view, we’re at a ‘bottoming out’ rather than a tipping point – he was hopeful that despite the challenges, we may well start to see a moderate return to growth over the next 18 months. In his words: ‘South Africa is, in its own strange and bumbling way, moving forward’.
A number of local financial commentators have, however, suggested South Africa may even be beyond a tipping point. So it’s within an extremely uncertain and volatile environment that local investors have to make financial decisions. Our Director of Investments, Alwyn van der Merwe, told our clients that what we may believe to be rational decisions under the circumstances, are not necessarily always the correct ones. American economist Herbert Simon referred to ‘bounded rationality’ – as investors, we often take decisions that may be entirely rational on the face of it, but they’re based on false information or a particular news flow, and they’re taken at the wrong time. This results in ‘satisfying’, but certainly not optimal decision-making.
Alwyn cited an example of perceived rationality: during 2001, investors got spooked when the rand weakened significantly against the US dollar for various reasons, including a delay in the privatisation of Telkom, concerns around unemployment, and tightening of exchange controls. The popular view in the investment world at the time was that South Africa was at a tipping point and on its way to becoming another Zimbabwe. Many investors were determined to ship their money offshore at all costs, despite an irrationally low rand. As it turned out, 2001 wasn’t the tipping point they had anticipated, and over the next two years the rand recovered to around R6 to the US dollar.
This perceived rational decision had dire consequences for investors who migrated their investments offshore. In fact, had one invested R100 in the S&P500 Index in 2000, it would be worth R500 today. Investing R100 in the JSE All Share Index (ALSI), however, would have resulted in this amount growing to R700 over the same time period. Investors would therefore have done better over the past 19 years remaining invested in South Africa in rands than in the US in dollars. (This example doesn’t imply Sanlam Private Wealth is arguing against offshore investments, but rather that financial markets often overreact in extreme cases and that so-called rational decisions under these circumstances may be sub-optimal.)
Alwyn told our clients that although it’s challenging to remain unemotional when being bombarded with negative news flow on a daily basis, it would be decidedly unwise to make investment calls based on fear-mongering by sometimes unreliable news sources, however ‘rational’ these decisions may seem. He recommended three ‘rules’ for investors in uncertain times:
In conclusion, we heard from Alwyn that while we may not be approaching a tipping point just yet in South Africa, there’s no getting away from the significant risks investors now have to contend with, both global and local. In the face of tremendous uncertainty, the laws of finance will prevail over the long term, however, and reward investors patient enough to stay the course over time. The principles of diversification, price and value, and risk and return will continue to apply. However, political and economic realities require patience, and the biggest mistake investors can make is to allow bounded rationalism to make the satisfying decision – and not the efficient decision.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
are they a good investment?
The great lockdown:
one year on
Head of Equities
IHG: focus on
quality pays off
Sanlam Active UK Fund
BUDGET 2021: THE RIGHT INTENT,
BUT RISKS ABOUND
Investment Economist at Sanlam Investments
INVESTING IN 2021:
WHAT TO EXPECT
Sanlam Private Wealth
MINING: IS THE
THROUGH THE HYPE
Head of Equities
Jack is back – business
as usual for Alibaba?
Global Equity Analyst, Sanlam UK
South AfricaSouth Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStar
Rest of AfricaSanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth Mauritius
GlobalGlobal Investment Solutions
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.