Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
how investors benefit
Chief Investment Officer
Nov 28, 2018
Over the past 15 years, around US$2.5 trillion has flowed into passive exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the US, while over the same period, around US$500 billion has flowed away from actively managed funds. Closer to home, a plethora of funds tracking market indices has also exploded onto the South African market over the past few years. What’s behind this fast-growing trend – have investors lost faith in active fund management in a low-return environment? If so, are these misgivings justified?
The figures from the US don’t appear encouraging for the active camp. Statistics from various sources indicate that during most years in that country, fewer than 40% of money managers succeed in outperforming the S&P500 Index after fees. Legendary Stanford University finance professor William Sharpe has even argued that, ‘after costs, the return on the average actively managed dollar will be less than the return on the average passively managed dollar’.
Hedge funds have also come under fire – in 2007, Warren Buffet famously took a US$1 million bet against them, suggesting they couldn’t outperform the S&P500 Index over a 10-year period. He won the bet with ease.
While one can’t deny the veracity of some of these facts and figures, we do need to see them in context. First, South African investors should be wary of simply extrapolating the US experience to our market. In the US, institutional ownership is far higher than in most other countries. Also – unsurprisingly, given its size – the US may be viewed as the world’s most efficient market.
In 2015, US passive investment giant Vanguard published a study showing that of the more than 500 funds that had beaten the index over the preceding 15 years, 98% had in fact underperformed in at least four of those years.
In the UK, significant work by pension giant Schroders showed that active funds benchmarked to a broad UK index outperformed such indices on average over most rolling five-year periods from 2000 to 2017. In 2015 and 2016, more than 70% of active UK funds beat the benchmark after fees on a rolling five-year basis. The evidence for emerging markets as a whole also suggests that active fund management outperforms.
Second, Sharpe’s argument regarding returns assumes both active and passive investments have the same opportunity set and that all participants have the same objectives. It also stems from the view that markets are efficient, which numerous research papers have shown to be less true than many academics would like to believe.
In our view, the most obvious red flags in the active-passive debate relate to the choice of benchmarks. In the South African equity space, portfolio managers use a variety of benchmarks – from the All-Share Index (ALSI), Top40 Index and Swix, to a capped ALSI (with limits on exposure to any given stock) and a capped Swix. While these indices should all move in similar directions, performance does vary.
In South Africa and indeed in most markets, the indices used for comparison don’t represent actual investable products. For example, South Africa’s largest ETF, the Satrix 40, offers exposure only to the JSE’s 40 largest stocks, thus ignoring a long tail of potential winners and losers.
Also, in emerging markets such as South Africa, indices are often highly concentrated (43% of the ALSI was made up of resources in 2008, and Naspers accounted for more than 20% in 2017, for example), which means passive investors often believe themselves to be far more diversified than they actually are.
We should also remember that while passive products are cheaper than active solutions, they’re certainly not free. This means that after fees, all passive funds are guaranteed to underperform their own benchmarks.
The most overlooked aspect of active management, however, is its ability to exclude securities and thus win not only by picking winners, but also by avoiding losers. At exactly the time when prudent active managers are selling shares in an overvalued company, passive investors will likely be buying, and vice versa.
We need to mention here that historically, many investment managers – both in South Africa and elsewhere – have in fact been closet index-trackers, while taking fees for ‘active’ management. The rise of passive funds has, however, forced many such players out of the market, which we welcome.
One of the main advantages of active management is that it takes into account the particular requirements – and, more importantly, risk tolerance – of individual investors. At Sanlam Private Wealth, our investment model provides customised solutions to each of our clients, based on individual needs, risk tolerance, liquidity requirements and tax considerations.
Using our consistent, reliable and proven investment philosophy of price, perspective and pattern, we take a proactive approach to determine which portfolio of securities best suits each individual client’s needs, while maximising the likely long-term returns. We also decide on the most appropriate asset-class composition for each client’s objectives and risk profile – there are of course no indices for this crucial part of active management.
The results speak for themselves. Sanlam Private Wealth’s customised local and global equity, multi-asset and offshore portfolios have a strong record of outperforming their benchmarks over the long term. Our house-view equity portfolio has (after fees) outperformed South Africa’s largest passive funds over all time frames from one to 10 years.
We’re not for a moment suggesting there is no place for passive investing – both active and passive solutions have an important role to play in a diversified portfolio. It is our view, however, that investors who limit themselves to passive options are unnecessarily narrowing the available opportunities for long-term investment growth – we encourage investors to use each method where appropriate.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
South AfricaSouth Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStar
Rest of AfricaSanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth Mauritius
GlobalGlobal Investment Solutions
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.