Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
BUDGET 2020:
LOOKS GOOD ONLY ON PAPER
Finance Minister Tito Mboweni’s Budget Speech has by now been thoroughly dissected and debated. There’s no doubt he had to table it in highly challenging circumstances – in our view, the Minister displayed considerable political bravery and for this, he needs to be commended. However, it would be naïve not to acknowledge that while his proposals look good on paper, it remains to be seen whether they’ll translate into meaningful action. We’ve witnessed too often in recent years our government being strong on plans, but failing dismally in execution. We can’t ignore the risks that remain in a number of crucial areas.
After the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) in October last year, we argued that our Finance Minister had to present the statement in an economic and political environment fraught with challenges. Last week’s Budget Speech was no different. Fiscal trends were all pointing in the wrong direction, and this had to be addressed if the Minister was to be seen as being truly dedicated to ultimately stabilising government debt levels in 2023/24.
In the run-up to the Budget Speech, analysts speculated whether Minister Mboweni would have the fortitude to address the obvious overspending on government consumption to reduce expenditure in relation to gross domestic product (GDP), as his options to generate increased revenue were rather limited in an environment in which economic growth is not exactly positive in real terms.
Although numbers weren’t unimportant for this Budget, it was clear that ‘the market’ wanted the Minister to show signs that he would address these issues:
The focus of Minister Mboweni’s proposed spending restraint, which decreases budget non-interest spending by R156.1 billion over the next three years, is a R160.2 billion decrease in the government’s wage bill. Treasury believes this reduction will be achieved through a combination of changes to cost-of-living adjustments, pay progression and other benefits. If successful, these changes will see the consolidated wage bill shrink by 1% in real terms over the medium term. This follows a period in which the wage bill has grown by around 40% over the past 12 years, crowding out capital expenditure and spending on other projects crucial for service delivery.
Given the struggling economy and the already elevated tax-to-GDP ratio (an estimated 26.3% in 2020/21), Treasury made the surprising decision not to raise additional revenue from taxes in 2020/21. The adjustment to personal income tax reflects a higher-than-inflation increase in brackets and rebates that will ‘cost’ the fiscus a net R2 billion. The focus will instead be on rebuilding capacity at the South African Revenue Service (SARS) and restoring the public’s trust in this institution.
The primary budget deficit – the deficit before allowing for interest payments – of -2.6% of GDP for 2019/20 is projected to decrease to -1.1% of GDP by 2022/23. This is indeed a movement in the right direction. However, it still falls short of the surplus of at least 1% of GDP required to stabilise the debt ratio.
Unfortunately, despite the positive signs mentioned above, the net result doesn’t lead to an improved gross debt-to-GDP ratio. In fact, the debt trajectory mapped out in Budget 2020 sees gross loan debt increase to 65.6% of GDP in 2020/21 from 61.6% in 2019/20, and then increase to 69.1% in 2021/22 and 71.6% in 2022/23. This estimate is roughly in line with the projections captured in the MTPBS in October 2019.
Judging by the response in the currency, the bond market and rand-sensitive equities, ‘the market’ decided to focus on the positive signs. The fact that the debt ratio has not been projected to deteriorate much further was also seen in a positive light.
Although we applaud the Minister’s political bravery to address the important issues, we believe it would be naïve not to note that although the Budget Speech reflects intent, it’s unfortunately only on paper. In recent years – admittedly under different leadership – we’ve consistently witnessed the government falling woefully short – for various reasons – in executing its plans.
We see risks in three areas:
There is, however, little doubt that the narrative of the Budget Speech suggests that the government is prepared to initiate the first steps to address a fiscal dilemma that will take a number of years to solve – provided it stays the course.
This Budget Speech was more than just a fiscal plan. South Africans and the world wanted confirmation as to whether the government was prepared to put a plan together that might not be popular with its traditional alliance partners, but would put our economy on a better footing. There were certainly signs that the willingness is there. Whether this will be enough to address the fiscal and economic growth concerns of rating agency Moody’s remains to be seen.
The bond market responded positively as the bellwether government bond, R186, strengthened by 10 basis points after the Minister’s speech. The funding needs for the current fiscal year didn’t change materially. To expect sustained strength in bond prices would surprise us given the forecast risk of longer-term funding and South Africa’s current economic realities.
Local equity investors were delighted. We saw significant share price increases in the banking and local retail sectors. We’ve argued for a while that these shares are cheap, and we have in recent months cautiously increased exposure to these two sectors in our client portfolios, based purely on valuation principles. Again, we did not identify a National Budget as a potential trigger for increased buying interest in these two sectors. Our view has been that low expectations in terms of financial performance would ultimately support the prices of these arguably cheap shares. We hope this step in the right direction will be the first in a longer journey that will ultimately unlock value in these shares.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
We constantly challenge the norm. Our investment process is a thorough and diligent one.
Michael York has spent 21 years in Investment Management.
Have a question for Michael?
South Africa
South Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStarRest of Africa
Sanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth MauritiusGlobal
Global Investment SolutionsCopyright 2019 | All Rights Reserved by Sanlam Private Wealth | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (FAIS) | Principles and Practices of Financial Management (PPFM). | Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) | Conflicts of Interest Policy | Privacy Statement
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
MANDATORY DISCLOSURE
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.