Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
China's regulatory moves:
cause for concern?
Aug 06, 2021
The internet sector has done spectacularly well since the global pandemic began in March last year, showing how interdependent human society has become via the internet. The rapid growth in profits and proliferation of services has therefore led to certain practices being deemed to be against societal interests by politicians and the public alike.
While regulatory discussions in the US and EU are progressing slowly, in China, new regulations are often implemented at very short notice. Traditionally, Chinese tech regulators have allowed innovation to progress, and only once a particular new vertical has reached significant scale have they stepped in aggressively to eliminate the perceived harmful practices.
This was evident three years ago when the regulator reformed the online gaming industry overnight – all players had to log in to online video games using their ID numbers to prevent underage children from playing certain titles, school students were banned from playing games after 9pm, and all new games had to be approved by the regulator before being allowed to monetise.
Tencent was particularly impacted by this set of regulations, due to its dominant position in the Chinese online gaming industry. The company quickly implemented the new rules and adjusted its business model: it began releasing less violent games, monitoring game session durations, and restricting access to school-age users at certain times of day. Tencent’s share price fell 47% during 2018, but recovered well thereafter.
The past year has seen significant regulatory overhaul in new internet verticals that have affected major Chinese consumer internet companies. Examples include:
All these factors have led to a large sell-off in Chinese internet companies, including the big three: Baidu (-39% year to date), Alibaba (-17% year to date) and Tencent (-30% year to date, in US$). The regulatory impact on Tencent this time round has been more benign – the company lost its monopoly music distribution rights recently, but this doesn’t feature significantly in its revenue mix. The company has an 80% market share in online music streaming via its Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME) holding, and this was used by TME to force global music labels to grant it exclusive distribution rights in China. Going forward, Tencent will face more competition in this vertical, but will likely remain the dominant player.
The latest event to impact Tencent’s share price was an article in an online publication owned by Xinhua, a state media company. The piece compared online gaming addiction to ‘spiritual opium’ – a highly emotive phrase given the role of the Opium Wars in China’s history. The article was adjusted later to remove the phrase, and a government official stated that the official view wasn’t as critical as the article suggested.
The Chinese government doesn’t appear to be aiming to destroy the online gaming industry, but it does want to ensure that video game addiction among the youth is reduced. While the regulator itself has not made any comments on the matter, Tencent responded proactively on the day the article appeared, introducing age-related user restrictions. It’s important to note that gaming revenue from minors accounts for only around 6% of Tencent’s revenue from games, so the impact on total gaming revenue is not expected to be material at this stage.
Outside China, the US Congress has held hearings with CEOs of large internet companies, as public opinion has shifted towards increasing oversight of the sector. Prominent American senators like Elizabeth Warren have even proposed breaking up Facebook via a forced disposal of Instagram and WhatsApp. This would impact Facebook’s growth outlook, since Instagram provides a significant amount of user and ad revenue growth relative to the core Facebook platform.
Similarly, Warren’s antitrust plan suggests that Amazon should divest Whole Foods and refrain from entering the grocery delivery business, a very promising future growth vertical. Amazon has invested significant capital into supply chain technology for this purpose. As for Google, it would be forced to divest DoubleClick, the online ad purchasing marketplace that connects ad inventory on platforms with ad purchasers at agencies and companies. Google would lose the ability to observe pricing trends in real time and thus adjust its own Google Search pricing to control the price of its own product.
Where does all this leave South African investors? Naspers, which has a large stake in Tencent, has followed the latter company’s share price down this year. Investors should be aware of the ever-present regulatory risk in China, but should also remain cognisant of the long-term growth potential still evident in this sector.
It should be noted that Tencent has fared well in terms of regulatory changes compared to other tech firms and compared to its own experience with gaming regulation, as mentioned above. Furthermore, the regulator in one way actually helped Tencent by approving its merger with Sogou from 2020. Sogou, China’s second largest search engine after Baidu with a 6% market share, has been integrated into Tencent’s super-app, WeChat. This has enhanced WeChat’s monetisation by creating social search functionality – this would be akin to WhatsApp or Facebook having embedded search queries within their apps, thus circumventing Google.
Moreover, Tencent continues to innovate in other new verticals beyond social search. For example, WeChat Channels is a direct competitor to Douyin (the sister company of TikTok). Short video has taken China by storm, with over 500 million daily active users and 40% ad revenue share within the online video segment already. While Douyin is the largest company in this space, Tencent should benefit (via WeChat Channels) from the strong projected growth in ad revenue for short video over the next few years.
Another high-growth vertical is, of course, fintech. China has by far the largest online payments market in the world, with 770 million users using their mobile phones as their primary method of payment. TenPay has a 40% market share in this annuity income vertical.
Considering its strong competitive position and a more attractive valuation post the recent sell-off, Tencent (and thus Naspers) is offering a compelling investment case at present. Tencent’s forward price-to-earnings ratio has declined to 22 times, versus its historical average of around 30 times. Excluding the estimated fair value of its investee portfolio, this ratio drops to 17 times. Subtract another 50% discount when investing through Naspers, and the valuation really starts to look appealing.
Meanwhile, Tencent’s earnings have continued to display both impressive growth and quality. First-quarter 2021 core earnings grew 22% year-on-year, while free cash conversion was at 100%. All of this speaks not just to the value that Tencent generates for shareholders, but also for its consumers as well the government. The company remains a national champion and strategic asset in China, despite the pressures from policy changes.
Regulation, like death and taxes, is a guaranteed feature of life. As investors, we can only try to understand the underlying motives of political actors and plan accordingly. The discount rate that investors apply to these internet companies is likely to rise while these regulatory developments occur, but the vital role this sector plays in our daily lives has not changed at all.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
FINANCIAL MARKET JITTERS:
ARE THEY JUSTIFIED?
Sanlam Private Wealth
THE STORY OF TECH:
WILL THE BULL RUN LAST?
Head of Equities
TIME TO SHINE?
Senior Investment Analyst
THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION
Head of Equities
SA UNREST: HAS THE
BUSINESS CYCLE UPSWING BEEN DERAILED?
Investment Economist at Sanlam Investments
THE CONTRARIAN CASE
FOR PROPERTY STOCKS
Head of Equities
ADDING VALUE THROUGH ACTION
Head of Equities
choosing the right structure
Sanlam Private Wealth
South AfricaSouth Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStar
Rest of AfricaSanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth Mauritius
GlobalGlobal Investment Solutions
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.