Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
Richemont still sparkling
Chief Investment Officer
May 23, 2022
For many consumers, luxury goods represent an aspirational haven of quality and history, and JSE stalwart Richemont’s classic brands have been at the forefront of this market for more than a century, delighting those who can afford them with exclusive, elegant, stylish and enduring pieces.
As was the case in many industries, the events in the first quarter of 2020 had a significant impact on the fortunes of this premier luxury goods group. At the end of March of that year, 45% of Richemont’s stores were closed due to lockdowns, and the group had to place a substantial portion of its Swiss-based manufacturing workforce on furlough.
Management also instituted a hiring and salary freeze. The group’s sales in the quarter to the end of March 2020 were down 19% year-on-year, and the next quarter saw revenue fall by 47% year-on-year as store closures continued, global tourism came to a standstill and consumer sentiment cratered.
Given the fixed-cost nature of the business, and consequent high level of operating leverage, management battened down the hatches and focused on cash preservation, cost reduction – and survival. The difference between a minimum-wage store assistant at a budget clothing retailer and a motivated, specialised salesperson able to make things happen certainly became apparent – Richemont’s dedicated sales staff took the bull by the horns and found new ways to connect and engage directly with their clients.
Amid the doom and gloom, what happened next took both the wider market and Richemont management by surprise. The market had underestimated – even early on during the pandemic – the strength of the shift in consumer spend from services that were no longer available towards goods. By the end of 2021, consumer spend on goods was running at 25% above trend, while spend on services was 5% below trend.
At the same time, the developed world enjoyed almost unprecedented levels of government support, particularly in the form of cheap money via low interest rates. This was positive for asset prices across the board, which had a disproportionate impact on the wealthier end of global society. The luxury goods market had a fantastic year in 2021 as we emerged from the doldrums of the pandemic, with strong equity markets, many new cryptocurrency millionaires, cheap money and a dearth of tourism options to spend it on.
Richemont was among the beneficiaries. The group’s sales for the year to the end of March 2022 were nearly 40% above pre-pandemic levels, with the jewellery division, the primary beneficiary, up over 50%. Similar trends are evident for the other major luxury players.
In the years before the pandemic, Richemont had been moving into the online space, first via its investment in YOOX Net-a-Porter and subsequently via its 2019 tie-up with Alibaba to sell luxury goods through the Feng Mao joint venture. The move was, however, slow, particularly for the higher-end products, where management was wary of damaging brand equity through ubiquitous availability.
The pandemic accelerated the move online in many industries, luxury goods being no exception – and companies with pre-existing capabilities benefited the most. Although most sales of luxury items still take place in-store, it’s clear that a greater proportion of wealthy customers are now making their purchase decisions online.
A more online-focused model makes good business sense for the luxury goods industry. The cost of delivery is a far smaller proportion of the total sales price and companies can save on expensive store space. Selling online provides easy access to customers who would previously have fallen outside the store network. It also allows luxury goods companies to slowly shift towards a model with more variable costs and fewer fixed costs, which is positive for earnings stability over time. Lastly, luxury goods work well in our modern Instagram celebrity world that encourages displays of wealth.
A trend that accelerated throughout the pandemic was the strength of the largest brands in the luxury industry. There are likely multiple reasons for this, but key among them is that the bigger brands generally handled the transition to online more effectively. The more famous brands also benefit from people looking for goods online, where search typically remains within known brands.
Larger brands tend to have more in-country stores, particularly in China. Those with superior footprints in Asia therefore benefited on a relative basis from the decline of tourism – around half of the pre-pandemic luxury spend of Chinese nationals used to take place overseas.
Finally, the general trend within the industry is away from department store formats that sell multiple brands towards brand-owned stores. This reduces the chance of customers discovering new, competing brands.
Over the past two years, the exceptional growth of the luxury goods market in the US has surprised us. For many years, China was the primary driver of growth in this space, but since the pandemic, the US has become a more relevant growth driver. This could be partly due to the fact that the US reopened more quickly than other regions, but in our view, maturing tastes among older customers and the rise of younger cryptocurrency millionaires both supported the increased demand in 2021. How sustainable this is, remains to be seen.
This growth surprise drove the stock prices of luxury goods to record levels. At their November 2021 peaks, Richemont and LVMH were trading at 30 and 32 times forward price-earnings (P/E) multiples respectively, among their highest on record, and these were based on top-of-the-cycle earnings expectations. The market was essentially extrapolating the recent growth numbers into perpetuity.
In our view, these price increases were not sustainable – and thus far in 2022, the combination of changing equity market sentiment and the end of cheap money has weighed on equity valuations. At the same time, the market has realised that consumer spend will likely slow given the potent cocktail of rising inflation and higher interest rates. Accordingly, the valuations of luxury goods companies have declined materially this year and the shares now appear more reasonably priced.
We retain our long-held view that the luxury sector has some excellent businesses. Simply put, it takes 100 years to build 100 years of brand history. This gives exceptional brands like Richemont’s Cartier, which is now 175 years old, an untouchable advantage in our disposable world.
We see luxury goods as a play on the continued rise of global inequality. On top of this, branded fine jewellery (for example, Cartier, Tiffany, Van Cleef & Arpels and Bulgari) makes up only about 14% of the total jewellery market, leaving a substantial growth runway available for the industry over the long term.
Recent share price declines mean that for the first time in a few years, great luxury businesses are moving towards price levels where they may also be good investments for our clients over the long term.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
South AfricaSouth Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStar
Rest of AfricaSanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth Mauritius
GlobalGlobal Investment Solutions
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.