Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
should it scare investors?
Alwyn van der Merwe
Director of Investments
Aug 22, 2018
Eight months into a tumultuous 2018, investors may be forgiven for being sceptical about the prospects of a wide range of financial markets. We started the year with the Steinhoff saga fresh in our memories following that company’s share price collapse early in December 2017 – a result of fraudulent activities that triggered questions about the diligence and competency of professional investors.
The changing of the guard within the ANC leadership later the same month sparked renewed optimism, however, with the rand strengthening. The share prices of South African-focused companies appreciated materially on the back of this euphoria late in December and January. The positive sentiment also spilled over in a strong recovery in consumer confidence in the first quarter and economists adjusted their growth forecasts for 2018 on the assumption that the improved sentiment would be enough to boost actual economic activity.
Sadly, the euphoria has now petered out and the economic realities of the day are in stark contrast with the initial expectations. Also, financial markets – not only the equity market – have started to reflect these realities with pedestrian performances following the peaks recorded in mid-January.
From a macro perspective, our base case has always been that we’re in an advance stage of a global economic upswing and that we should expect the growth momentum to slow over the next two years. Economic upcycles usually end when interest rate shocks, normally inflation related, deflate the cycle, or an external shock, often an oil price upset, creates a hurdle for sustained economic growth. As growth in the US has matched expectations, the unemployment rate is at historically low levels. There are signs of higher inflation, and policy rates in the US are on the up.
Higher US interest rates have certainly not derailed economic growth in that country. However, they’ve caused pain in other areas. While the higher rates have supported the US dollar, they’ve conversely had a negative impact on emerging market currencies, and therefore in many cases the performance of both emerging market equities and government bonds.
For emerging economies struggling with structural economic issues, the pain has been more tangible, especially for Brazil and Turkey. Although South Africa doesn’t have the same structural issues, we’ve also became a victim as investors withdraw their money from the tainted emerging markets investment category in general.
Increased US interest rates have also leaned heavily on the share prices of so-called consumer staples internationally. Many of these were seen as proxies for interest-bearing investments in a low interest rate environment, and were trading at inflated valuations. With the higher rates, investors have switched out of these shares back into interest-bearing investments, with a resultant decline in share prices in this category. This is partly the reason why the share price of tobacco stocks like Philip Morris is down by 23% year-to-date and why British American Tobacco has suffered a similar fate on the London Stock Exchange.
As stated, shocks can bring an economic cycle to an end. As the word implies, it’s impossible to forecast a shock. However, a full-blown trade war – the beginnings of which are now in evidence – would certainly present a major risk to the longevity of the global economic cycle. The war of words – and initial actions – between US president Donald Trump and China’s Xi Jinping have clearly resulted in uncertainty in the performance of risky assets: equities, property and currencies.
Equity markets in particular have at times responded violently to the tit-for-tat trade battle between the various camps. Liberal trade arrangements have, since the 1950s, undoubtedly contributed positively to stronger global economic growth, and a reverse to this approach is likely to have the opposite effect.
Investors globally have also responded harshly to disappointing operational performance. The biggest casualty has been Facebook. After the company came under scrutiny for its privacy policies, the share price started to reflect investor jitters during CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony to the US Congress in March. It was Facebook’s disappointing results, however, that wiped 22% – or a massive US$136 billion – off its market capitalisation, in two trading sessions. This movement is astounding if one considers the amount of investment research done on this company – little wonder that many investors are questioning the value of research done by professional investors!
Closer to home, it wasn’t only the pedestrian economic growth rate that disappointed in the first six months of the year, relative to expectations. The narrative associated with the low growth rate was rather scary. We followed a cautious approach to investing in local government bonds, as we’d warned earlier about a deteriorating fiscal situation – partly as a result of mismanagement and corruption within state-owned enterprises in particular.
Our biggest concern remains Eskom. There seems to be no end in sight for this organisation’s financial woes while management and labour bizarrely persist in negotiating on wages when it’s obvious that productivity falls far short of any international standard. To top it all, a reliable supply of electricity is crucial for business, particularly for manufacturing – an economic sector rapidly losing ground against more productive nations.
Corporate South Africa hasn’t been able to escape this tough economic backdrop. Two years ago, we warned that an oversupply of property and high valuations wouldn’t be sustainable when the tide goes out. Indeed, the Listed Property Index has lost 24% of its value since the start of the year.
The sharpest drop has been in the Resilient group of companies. Following accusations of foul play from local hedge fund managers, the counters within the group have fallen significantly and haven’t recovered since. There’s still an ongoing investigation by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) into possible price manipulation by both Resilient and Fortress, and the share price is unlikely to gain materially before this investigation has been concluded.
While the previously unpopular mining counters Anglo American and Billiton have advanced strongly year-to-date, former darlings have come under severe pressure. Curro Holdings traded 26% lower and the share price of its sister company Stadio halved over the period. These declines had very little to do with the operational performance of the companies but were simply a correction from extreme valuations. A few single-commodity resource counters moved from what some regarded as cheap, to even cheaper – precious metal producers Lonmin, Sibanye Gold, Northam Platinum and Impala Platinum all lost more than 30% of their value over the period.
Investment market uncertainty will always be with us to some degree – currently amplified by the advanced stage of the economic cycle and increased interference by authorities in the normal evolution of economic trends.
In our view, heightened uncertainty can be either positive or negative. It’s negative in the sense that although we’d like to craft portfolios that reflect high conviction, we’d caution against extreme views given the wide range of possible investment outcomes. But it’s also true that during times of uncertainty, investors act emotionally, and, from a longer-term perspective, price assets incorrectly. Such emotional behaviour invariably provides good investment opportunities for those skilful enough to identify them and patient enough to watch the long-term benefits unfold.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
are they a good investment?
The great lockdown:
one year on
Head of Equities
IHG: focus on
quality pays off
Sanlam Active UK Fund
BUDGET 2021: THE RIGHT INTENT,
BUT RISKS ABOUND
Investment Economist at Sanlam Investments
INVESTING IN 2021:
WHAT TO EXPECT
Sanlam Private Wealth
MINING: IS THE
THROUGH THE HYPE
Head of Equities
Jack is back – business
as usual for Alibaba?
Global Equity Analyst, Sanlam UK
South AfricaSouth Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStar
Rest of AfricaSanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth Mauritius
GlobalGlobal Investment Solutions
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.