Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
Naspers:
keep calm and carry on
The sharp decline of the Naspers share price during 2018 after its meteoric rise last year has led to concerns that the remarkable success story of the global technology and media giant might be coming to an end. Despite the share price volatility, our investment view on Naspers hasn’t changed, however – we remain constructive on the outlook for the group over the longer term.
JSE behemoth Naspers has undoubtedly been the share with the largest impact on our local equity market over the past two decades. Its weighting in the FTSE/JSE All Share Index has increased from 1% in 2004 to 17% currently – indicating the extent of its outperformance compared to the rest of the market. The big game changer for the group has of course been its investment in 2001 in Chinese internet conglomerate Tencent.
Following a 76% rise in 2017, this year has proved to be much more challenging for the Naspers share price, which has slumped by 21% year-to-date at the time of writing (or 33% at its low in October). The decline has come mostly on the back of the dwindling price of Tencent, which constitutes around 80% of the fair value of Naspers’ net assets.
Emotional forces naturally result in the view of both investors and market commentators to ebb and flow along with a company’s share price, which can in turn aggravate the movement of the latter, either up or down. At any given time, one can objectively identify a number of potential risks and opportunities for any company, although it isn’t always possible to predict with certainty which of these will actually play out. This is why an analyst will assign probabilities to different outcomes when valuing a company.
The market, however, tends to dramatically change its narrative on a company – either over-emphasising the opportunities or the risks – based on recent share price movements. The mechanism is straightforward: people tend to seek reasons why a share has moved in a particular direction, which media houses will eagerly provide. The news flow then reinforces investor bias.
This may lead to temporary share mispricing, driven by fear or greed, which a prudent investor with a longer investment horizon may try to exploit. However, it’s crucial to be able to translate all the relevant news on a company into the correct perspective – which is one of the three pillars of our investment philosophy at Sanlam Private Wealth.
Tencent’s share price has declined by 38% from its high in January, following a nearly 67 000% return since its listing in 2004. After 2017, a year in which Tencent seemed unable to put a foot wrong, the news flow has predictably turned negative as the share price has declined.
The most significant negative news around Tencent this year has related to the restructuring of certain Chinese government departments, resulting in no new online games being approved for monetisation since March. Chinese online game publishers (of which Tencent is the largest) have suffered large share price declines as a consequence, highlighting the regulatory risks associated with operating in this market.
Furthermore, Chinese officials have stated that they’re planning to introduce time limits on gaming for minors to prevent the onset of myopia caused by too much screen time. Negative news flow has also emanated from the noise around the so-called US-China trade war, which could potentially disrupt global trade flows.
When assessing all the relevant information to arrive at the correct perspective on the news flow around Tencent, the appropriate question to ask is: how does it influence the fundamental valuation of the group? This in turn depends on the impact on its long-term expected cash flow. If it’s not significant, the information is simply noise and likely to have only a temporary impact on the share price.
In determining this perspective, it makes sense to first look at the group’s starting valuation, as well as the share price movement of the general market over the same period. Tencent’s valuation at the start of 2018 was high following a number of years of strong operating results. Consequently, some normalisation in the share price shouldn’t be surprising.
However, the 40% discount to its net asset value that Naspers was trading at the time, ensured the effective valuation of Tencent (indirectly through Naspers) was still palatable. We did trim the Naspers weight marginally in our house view equity portfolio in February, but we added again in October following the share sell-off.
Tencent’s share price slump should also be seen in the context of a broader sentiment-driven sector decline. For example, Alibaba and JD.com, which wouldn’t have been impacted by the freeze in game approvals, also suffered share price drops this year. US tech companies such as Google, Facebook and Apple initially held up better than their Chinese counterparts, but came under pressure in the second half of 2018. Since the start of 2017, Tencent’s share price performance (in US dollar terms) hasn’t been out of line with the likes of Google.
The freeze in monetisation approval of new games has had a material negative impact on Tencent’s results over the past six months. It is the group’s view that this is a temporary issue, which should be resolved in due course once the restructured government departments have found their feet. This has also impacted competitors, which may be worse off without the large existing game portfolio and list of pre-approved titles that Tencent had in place.
The proposed limits on gaming time for minors in China is arguably a good thing for society, while the revenue impact on Tencent isn’t estimated to be material. Minors make up less than 20% of online gamers in China, but they’re also low revenue payers, resulting in less than 5% of gaming revenue being derived from this age group. Tencent has itself been proactive in establishing measures to restrict game time for minors on its platform.
While the issues around online gaming presented some challenges for Tencent this year, our investment case for the group – which is focused on the power and potential of its WeChat social network – remains intact. Launched in 2011, WeChat has a highly engaged user base of more than one billion. The basic service is free, and consumers are unlikely to leave the platform given its strong social network effect. However, the large user base has created a number of business opportunities for Tencent and its partners in the fields of advertising, music and video streaming, and business and financial services.
While gaming remains an important profit contributor, Tencent has been rapidly diversifying its revenue streams. For example, advertising revenue, where Tencent’s platforms remain materially under-monetised relative to user time spent, has grown by 47% year-on-year over the past quarter, contributing 20% to group revenue. Other revenue, which includes payment and cloud computing services, increased by 69%, contributing 25% of revenue. Online games have reduced their contribution to revenue from 55% in 2015 to 32% at present.
Over the years, Tencent has reinvested most of its profits in ‘partner’ companies, which we currently value at more than US$70 billion, or 20% of Tencent’s market cap. Tencent’s large user base has made it an investor of choice for these companies, which have benefited materially from access to these consumers. Despite the material underlying value of these investments, they’ve enjoyed little recognition in Tencent’s reported income statement to date. This makes them easy for investors to miss when using simple measures such as a price-to-earnings multiple to assess Tencent’s valuation.
Despite the share price volatility, our investment view on Naspers hasn’t changed much since we last wroteabout the group in June this year. We expected that Multichoice would be unbundled, and it’s now been confirmed that this will happen in 2019. The significant growth of OLX has also made this company increasingly ripe for a listing. The value of the Naspers rump will therefore become much more transparent over the next year or two. Looking beyond the current market turmoil, we remain constructive on the outlook for Naspers over the longer term.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
We can help you maximise your returns through an integrated investment plan tailor-made for you.
Niel Laubscher has spent 10 years in Investment Management.
Have a question for Niel?
South Africa
South Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStarRest of Africa
Sanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth MauritiusGlobal
Global Investment SolutionsCopyright 2019 | All Rights Reserved by Sanlam Private Wealth | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (FAIS) | Principles and Practices of Financial Management (PPFM). | Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) | Conflicts of Interest Policy | Privacy Statement
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
MANDATORY DISCLOSURE
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.