Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
On My Mind –
2017: a year of ineptitude
‘State capture’ was recently named as South Africa’s 2017 word of the year by the Pan South African Language Board, pipping words like ‘white monopoly capital’ and ‘blesser’ to the post. To my mind, however, there can be only one word that accurately reflects the zeitgeist of not only our own nation but also globally over the past year: ineptitude – particularly that of our political leaders. But whereas global markets have nonetheless rewarded investors relatively well, in South Africa, it has resulted in further knocks to already shaken investor confidence.
Hapless incompetence is what seems to have defined much of our world’s ethos during 2017. In the US, the first year of the Donald Trump presidency has been aptly labelled as that country’s ‘annus horribilis’. I need not elaborate. In the UK, Prime Minister Theresa May is struggling to keep head above water as Brexit gets messy and in Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel is against the ropes after failing to build a coalition. This, as some have surmised, may well result in French President Emmanuel Macron – who replaced the inept François Hollande in May – stepping into the vacuum as unofficial leader of the European Union.
On our own continent, a seemingly ineffectual African Union-led agreement has failed to see Democratic Republic of the Congo President Joseph Kabila loosen his 17-year grip on power and ensure a peaceful political transition. At least further down south the people of Zimbabwe have finally rid themselves of the corrupt and autocratic rule of Robert Mugabe – after 37 years during which that country’s economy was for all practical purposes destroyed.
In South Africa, the most significant development over the past year has been the revelation and realisation of the true extent of state capture and corruption, which has had a profound impact on our economy, morale and investor confidence. The #GuptaLeaks emails and fearless reporting by investigative journalists – including Jacques Pauw in his recently released The President’s Keepers – have revealed that the tentacles of state capture go far wider and deeper than ordinary South Africans could have imagined.
And let’s not forget the ineptitude that has surfaced on the corporate front during 2017, with names like KPMG, SAP, McKinsey, Bell Pottinger and most recently, MultiChoice, ignoring the principles of sound corporate governance in order to gain favour and/or contracts with those in power.
As a direct result of incompetent leadership, bureaucratic bungling and corruption, and a lack of meaningful economic policy on the part of our politicians, our economy remains under severe pressure. Years of meticulous supervision by central banks to counter the negative effects of the global financial crisis have led to synchronised global recovery in most regions, but South Africa has failed to reap much benefit from the economic uptick.
This year, 2017, will be remembered as the one in which South Africa’s credit rating was finally given the dubious distinction of being cut to ‘junk’. Rating agency S&P Global started the process by edging our foreign currency rating into junk territory in April, taking it down a further notch last week. To top it all, the agency at the same time downgraded our local currency debt rating to sub-investment grade. Moody’s has kept us at investment grade for now but put our government debt on review to be downgraded. Also last week, Fitch affirmed South Africa’s debt rating at sub-investment status.
Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba has done little to placate concerns – his extremely disappointing Medium Term Budget Policy Statement last month did little more than paint a grim picture of the challenges facing our economy – including national debt approaching 60% of gross domestic product.
Globally, the broad-based upswing resulted in equity markets continuing to rally since the start of the year. The MSCI World Index has returned 19.45% in US dollar terms year to date (YTD), while the S&P500 has returned 18.36% (US$) and the FTSE100 7.75% (GBP). Other emerging markets have performed relatively well, with the MSCI Emerging Markets Index returning 36.14% (US$).
Following the largely sideways trajectory of the past three years – and in contrast to an underwhelming return of 3.4% in first-half 2017, the JSE’s All Share Index (ALSI) has so far rewarded investors with 18.41% in the second half. The ALSI has delivered 22.4% YTD, with the All Share, Top 40 and Industrial indices all powering to all-time highs earlier this month.
One can’t look at these figures without taking into account the extraordinary performance of some of the dual-listed rand hedge stocks on the JSE, particularly market heavyweight Naspers, which reached an all-time high of R4 142 per share on 21 November. If you strip out Naspers returns YTD (88.3%), the ALSI has delivered a more modest 12.3% YTD.
So who were the big winners and losers of 2017? Besides the stellar performance of Naspers, other outstanding returns include Kumba Iron Ore (107.54% YTD), Niveus Investments (80%), Exxaro Resources (77.65%) and Trencor (75.23%). The worst-performing stocks were Consolidated Infrastructure (-87.16%), Arcelor Mittal SA (-58.61%), Brait SE (-49.65%), Lonmin (-47.14%) and EOH Holdings (-48.3%).
Despite the negative environment, corporate South Africa somehow got on with the job of building companies and shareholder value. Some highlights of 2017 were:
As could be expected, it was again a challenging year for our investment team. We can, however, look back at another year in which we added value to the wealth of our clients over the long term. The main reason is that we were patient – our investment philosophy is grounded in valuation rather than hope.
But adding value isn’t just about investing in the right shares – it’s also about navigating the potholes in the road. Although we did so with skill, we didn’t succeed in avoiding all of them. Those we were able to dodge include the healthcare sector, which delivered a disappointing performance overall. In fact, Mediclinic, which lost around 23% of its value in 2017, and Netcare, which lost 27%, were the two worst performing shares in the Top 40 Index this year. Our clients were exposed to Mediclinic only in an indirect way via our shareholding in Remgro.
In terms of companies that disappointed operationally, one pothole we unfortunately couldn’t avoid was Steinhoff, which has declined by 23.75% YTD. The investment case for the share remains sound, but we would certainly agree that Steinhoff’s management needs to urgently address market concerns around corporate governance.
In jittery markets such as we’ve experienced over the past year, even marginal disappointment in operational results can lead to extreme share price response. There was thus a distinct possibility during 2017 of an ‘ankle tap’ from one of the companies we hold in our portfolios. Fortunately, we experienced another year of excellent performance and added to the long-term value creation for our clients.
Looking ahead to 2018, amid a bombardment of new evidence of ineptitude and corruption on an almost daily basis, one can’t blame investors for believing there’s not much to inspire optimism. Given our dismal economic outlook, and the expected uptick in inflation resulting from a weaker rand, the prospects for most South Africans look decidedly bleak – with our official current unemployment rate of more than 27% unlikely to be reduced any time soon.
In addition, considerable tax increases in the February National Budget presentation seem unavoidable if Treasury is to make any kind of inroad into South Africa’s alarming national debt. This will no doubt hit wealthier individuals the hardest, with expected increases in personal income tax, capital gains tax and estate duties.
Tax increases on their own can never be the solution, however. To get our economy moving again, there needs to be a drastic reduction in state expenditure – without cutting infrastructure spending – and an ambitious commitment to growth. It’s precisely the absence of a clear strategy on the part of our country’s leadership to address the significant structural issues facing our economy that’s preventing it from being steered out of the doldrums.
Many South Africans are pinning their hopes on the ANC’s elective conference to be held in two weeks’ time. At our September client events, Frans Cronje of the South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR) warned that our country’s long-term prospects aren’t contingent on the leadership conference, however, or even who wins.
It was initially believed that Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa didn’t have much chance of taking over the reins, but according to the latest statistics this is looking increasingly possible – even the SAIRR is now cautiously optimistic that he may yet beat fellow presidential hopeful Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma to the top job. It appears as though the market has already factored in a Ramaphosa win – it’s the only way to explain the rand’s resilience over the past week in the aftermath of the latest round of credit downgrades.
The potential election of Ramaphosa as ANC leader will no doubt bring renewed hope to South Africans who are by now ‘gatvol’ of corrupt and inept politicians. But even with fresh leadership in the ruling party, and potentially a new president by the end of January 2018, we shouldn’t be naive enough to expect meaningful change overnight. It’s going to be a long and arduous journey to claw our country out of junk status, to kick-start our economy again and to root out corruption.
New leadership will, however, give South Africans a renewed sense of purpose. And this is something to look forward to in 2018. Perhaps the last word should go to former US President Lyndon B Johnson: ‘Yesterday is not ours to recover, but tomorrow is ours to win or lose.’ Wise words indeed for South Africans as we come to the end of a challenging 2017 and go into the new year.
I’d like to thank all our clients for your continued support during 2017. On behalf of all of us at Sanlam Private Wealth, I wish you a blessed festive season. May 2018 be a year that brings hope to all South Africans.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
We can help you maximise your returns through an integrated investment plan tailor-made for you.
Niel Laubscher has spent 10 years in Investment Management.
Have a question for Niel?
South Africa
South Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStarRest of Africa
Sanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth MauritiusGlobal
Global Investment SolutionsCopyright 2019 | All Rights Reserved by Sanlam Private Wealth | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (FAIS) | Principles and Practices of Financial Management (PPFM). | Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) | Conflicts of Interest Policy | Privacy Statement
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
MANDATORY DISCLOSURE
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.