Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
On My Mind
– Rearranging the deckchairs (again)
Former CEO of Sanlam Private Wealth
Jul 20, 2017
Global equity markets have continued to rally since the start of the year, supported by robust economic recovery in most regions of the world. The MSCI World index returned 9.4% in US dollar terms year-to-date (over the past year, it generated 15.4%). The Eurostoxx 600 returned 13.9%, and the S&P 500 7.4%. Whereas other emerging markets performed well (the MSCI Emerging Markets index returning 13%), the JSE did not follow suit, however – the All Share index delivered 6.8% in US dollars to investors year-to-date (and at 1.2% in rand terms continued its sideways trajectory of the past three years).
In our last On My Mind column in June, we spoke about political instability being the main factor derailing any chance South Africa may have had of benefiting from the broad-based global economic uptick. Since then, a six-day ANC policy conference has, while generating much noise and hot-tempered excitement, offered no glimmer of hope to appease investor sentiment. There was an unconvincing show of unity after days of intense debate but in the end, it appears all the event succeeded in doing was to rearrange the political deckchairs (again) without contributing anything of import to solve our country’s current woes.
Last week, Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba unveiled a short-term, 14-point ‘inclusive growth action plan’ to boost our economy, currently in a technical recession. In his announcement, Gigaba admitted that South Africa needed to take advantage of the opportunities presented by the global economy, including strong capital inflows into emerging markets. His ambitious plan wasn’t met by much enthusiasm beyond the ruling party, however, since once again it lacks substance and offers nothing new – and it’s not very clear how it will be implemented.
One proposal that emerged from the ANC policy conference that has set investors on edge is the possible nationalisation of the South African Reserve Bank (SARB). The rand immediately took a knock after ANC Economic Transformation Commission Chair Enoch Godongwana told a media briefing that it was an ‘anomaly’ for the SARB to be under private ownership – but that its ‘independence should be guaranteed’. He said the proposal would be tabled again at the ANC’s leadership conference in December.
SARB Governor Lesetja Kganyago was quick to point out that a change in the shareholding of the SARB wouldn’t amount to more control over the central bank, which would continue to derive its mandate from the Constitution. He had earlier slammed a recommendation by Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane for constitutional changes to enable the bank’s mandate to be amended.
In court papers filed in the Mkhwebane matter, Kganyago states that the Reserve Bank makes a critical contribution to the stability of our financial system, ‘which is central to sustainable growth and development, job creation, the reduction of inequality and poverty alleviation’. We couldn’t agree more – as a central pillar of our economy we need to be focusing on strengthening the SARB and other institutions, not undermining them, as the rating agencies have warned time and again. Whether the SARB is partly privately owned or totally state-owned, the operational independence of our central bank needs to be defended at all costs.
Several of the ‘areas of intervention’ in Gigaba’s economic plan relate to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), including plans to recapitalise and speed up the reform of some of these beleaguered institutions. The recapitalisation of both the South African Post Office and South African Airways (SAA) is due to be finalised by August, for example. In the case of SAA, Treasury recently issued a further guarantee to assist the ailing airline in repaying loans of R2.3 billion.
There are countless other examples of government bailouts of parastatals over the years – Denel, PetroSA and Eskom spring to mind. The financial wastage on some of these is staggering. We keep talking about radical economic transformation, and yet we persist in frittering away funds to these embattled institutions – billions of rands – which could have gone a long way toward effecting such transformation. Do we honestly need a national carrier? Or a state-owned arms manufacturer? Could the funds being drained into these loss-making ventures – which are contributing nothing to our economy – not be better spent on infrastructure and uplifting the poorest in our country?
Also protected by our Constitution is the right to a strong, independent and free media. It’s therefore of grave concern that this right is being severely compromised by the harassment of journalists going about their daily task of keeping South Africans informed. There have been several incidences of journalists being targeted of late – some have received death threats. Earlier this month, for example, the South African National Editors Forum (Sanef) felt compelled to take legal action against Black First Land First (BLF) over attacks on journalists reporting on alleged state capture.
We salute the journalists of our country who are bringing us the news in extremely challenging circumstances. In an open, democratic society, they play a crucial investigative role in uncovering excesses, malpractice, bribery and corruption where they find it – and they should be able to do this without fear of reprisal. Far more needs to be done to ensure they can continue their critical function of telling South Africa’s story and exposing the truth without interference.
The second half of 2017 is unlikely to deliver much in terms of implementing programmes for meaningful economic reform, despite Gigaba’s plans – the factions within the ANC will be far too busy garnering support in preparation for the crucial electoral conference in December. We can but hope that at that time, sanity will prevail and a change in leadership is effected that will steer our country out of the doldrums.
Much damage has been inflicted our economy, not least of which our junk rating by two major rating agencies, and being taken down a notch by a third. South Africa’s story may yet change for the better, however – if the anti-Zuma camp emerges victorious in December it may result in a much-needed change in investor sentiment. Both consumer and business confidence are likely to receive a boost, and our country can correct its course back towards joining the other emerging markets currently benefiting from the global economic recovery.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
navigating the complexities
Sanlam Trustees International
are they a good investment?
The great lockdown:
one year on
Head of Equities
IHG: focus on
quality pays off
Sanlam Active UK Fund
BUDGET 2021: THE RIGHT INTENT,
BUT RISKS ABOUND
Investment Economist at Sanlam Investments
INVESTING IN 2021:
WHAT TO EXPECT
Sanlam Private Wealth
MINING: IS THE
THROUGH THE HYPE
Head of Equities
South AfricaSouth Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStar
Rest of AfricaSanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth Mauritius
GlobalGlobal Investment Solutions
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.