Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
SA UNREST: HAS THE
BUSINESS CYCLE UPSWING BEEN DERAILED?
Investment Economist at Sanlam Investments
Jul 22, 2021
Undoubtedly, the unrest and violence that have engulfed large swathes of KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng have resulted in a material near-term hit to gross domestic product (GDP), given the loss of income and supply disruption. Damage to assets is expected to hinder production in the quarters ahead, while a share of job losses is also likely to be ‘permanent’.
Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal contribute a sizeable 35% and 16% respectively to South Africa’s total GDP of more than R5 trillion. Viewed simplistically, assuming around 300 working days per year, 0.17% of total South African GDP would be lost for each day in which production is entirely shut down in these two provinces.
Although the impact was not as widespread as this, it did affect large, economically important areas, including greater Johannesburg in Gauteng and uMgungundlovu and eThekwini in KwaZulu-Natal. In addition, the economy has been negatively impacted by the current pandemic-related Level 4 restrictions. Total South African real GDP is, therefore, expected to contract in the third quarter.
At the same time, the ongoing global economic recovery, the terms of trade bounce and accommodative monetary policy continue to underpin the economy. Moreover, rebuilding, refurbishment and restocking should boost real GDP heading into 2022. On balance, we expect average real GDP growth of 4.2% in 2021, a 0.3% decrease from our previous forecast.
Whereas economic activity seems likely to recover over the near term, the medium-term outlook for fiscal policy is now at greater risk. For decades, South Africa’s depression-level unemployment rate and its extreme levels of inequality and poverty have been a risk to the country’s long-term economic stability and growth prospects. According to Statistics South Africa, our poverty headcount is 56.8% and our poverty gap (the average shortfall relative to the level of income required to afford basic necessities) is 27.9%. Following recent events, we expect the government to step up its response as a matter of urgency.
Fiscal policy is one of the few levers the government can pull quickly. At present, South Africa’s dire fiscal situation has stabilised temporarily as the rebound in domestic income, supported by high commodity export prices, has underpinned government revenue. Indeed, the government’s total gross loan debt ratio is expected to remain largely unchanged at around 79% of GDP, or even decrease, in fiscal year 2021/22.
However, given modest GDP growth, the debt ratio is expected to resume its upward trajectory thereafter, especially since it will be difficult for the National Treasury to stick to its medium-term expenditure projections amid more urgent calls for additional support through social grants, which are an effective tool to provide targeted relief immediately.
Meanwhile, the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) can be expected to keep an eye on fiscal developments. South Africa’s failed fiscal policy is a potential source of inflation, while persistent sovereign debt rating downgrades have pushed up real borrowing costs. Supply disruptions are also likely to result in temporary price spikes.
However, given a wide negative output gap currently, a relatively benign medium-term inflation forecast of about 4.5% and soft credit extension, we expected the SARB Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) to leave the Bank’s repo rate unchanged at 3.50% earlier in July, as indeed it has done.
Looking further ahead, though, since we expect the cyclical recovery to continue, we think a narrowing output gap and the shift towards higher policy interest rates in some emerging markets are likely to prompt the MPC to begin hiking interest rates late in 2021 or early in 2022. Currently, we pencil in a 100bp increase in the repo rate over the next 18 months. Even so, after adjusting for expected inflation, the real repo rate is expected to remain low and accommodative for some time.
We should note, however, that these fiscal and monetary policy interventions can do little more than aim to maintain stability. Ultimately, the solution to South Africa’s socio-economic problems is GDP growth. This highlights the importance of the recent implementation of economic reforms, related to, for example, the energy and transport sectors.
However, reforms must gain momentum more broadly to bolster ailing business confidence, so that the current disruption to growth is temporary, while laying the foundation for a sustained, robust growth trend over the medium to long term.
Comment by Alwyn van der Merwe, Director of Investments at Sanlam Private Wealth:
When we construct client portfolios, we can’t ignore macro events that meaningfully impact financial markets – and the recent events undoubtedly require investors’ full attention. Not only do they significantly affect actual economic outcomes, but they also have a major impact on investor sentiment.
This change in sentiment goes beyond portfolio investments – it’s also likely to have consequences for direct investments in our economy, which ultimately create capacity for future growth. The well-publicised response by Toyota on the risks of doing business in an unstable environment should be a wake-up call to policymakers regarding the sensitivity of both international and local capital in terms of decision-making by capital allocators.
The currency is normally a barometer for international investor sentiment. We’ve argued that the rand was ‘correctly’ priced at around the R14/US$ level and that the strength beyond this was driven largely by very strong commodity export prices. It should therefore come as no surprise that the rand started to come under pressure, peaking at R13.42 on 4 June, after which it started to weaken.
This trend was accelerated during the events of last week, with the currency trading at R14.65/US$ at the time of writing. As a point of reference, the rand was trading at R19.10/US$ in April 2020. Although the recent move was material, the rand’s reaction was thus far more modest compared to the panic associated with the currency during the Great Financial Crisis and during the sell-off in the first quarter of 2020 when COVID-19 hit financial markets.
As expected, the share prices of companies that operate mainly in South Africa immediately sold off when the unrest started. The prices of local financial shares, retailers and local industrial companies were the big losers. It’s not clear how long the sentiment regarding these companies will remain under pressure. However, we’re still comfortable with the valuations of the banks and other ‘SA Inc’ shares we hold, despite the obvious short-term implications for earnings. In fact, we’ve used the opportunity to add to Bidvest, partly based on the cheaper entry point, but also since we believe the ‘market’ is underestimating the company’s growth potential.
Looking at the broader equity market, the sell-off in local equity prices coincided with an international sell-off in cyclical counters such as mining shares and global banks. This was driven largely by renewed growth fears as the Delta variant of COVID-19 forced reduced mobility measures in many countries. The weaker prices of South African commodity counters were, in our view, not related to the local unrest.
A final note: We have argued for a long time that geographical diversification makes for more robust, balanced and sustainable portfolios – and the recent events have once again underscored the validity of this approach.
FINANCIAL MARKET JITTERS:
ARE THEY JUSTIFIED?
Sanlam Private Wealth
THE STORY OF TECH:
WILL THE BULL RUN LAST?
Head of Equities
TIME TO SHINE?
Senior Investment Analyst
THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION
Head of Equities
China's regulatory moves:
cause for concern?
THE CONTRARIAN CASE
FOR PROPERTY STOCKS
Head of Equities
ADDING VALUE THROUGH ACTION
Head of Equities
choosing the right structure
Sanlam Private Wealth
South AfricaSouth Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStar
Rest of AfricaSanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth Mauritius
GlobalGlobal Investment Solutions
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.