Stay abreast of COVID-19 information and developments here
Provided by the South African National Department of Health
where to now for investors?
Alwyn van der Merwe
Director of Investments
Jul 12, 2019
Most asset managers would agree that the most important way to add significant value to investment portfolios is to get asset allocation just right. We certainly subscribe to this view, and through a meticulous process of analysing each asset class in terms of its relative price levels, as well as the macro factors that drive financial markets, our team of analysts decides on the most appropriate asset class composition for our clients’ portfolios.
There are times, however, when not a single asset class looks likely to shoot the lights out, and lamentably, this is one of those times. There’s of course a traditional pecking order in terms of long-term asset class returns, with equities leading the pack, followed by bonds and cash. Property lies somewhere in between.
As every investor knows, higher returns mean more risk – but investors in South African listed assets have over the past five years unfortunately not been rewarded for the risk of investing in them. Equities marginally underperformed both cash and local bonds over the period.
Internationally, investor experience was a bit different. Global equities, as measured by the MSCI World Index, outperformed bonds and cash. However, with the exception of US equities, the overall picture was similar to that of South Africa. These performances aren’t in line with the traditional financial laws investors have always relied on, which hold that investors in risky asset classes such as equities should expect outperformance as a reward for incorporating extra risk in their portfolios.
So what’s going on? In our view, the root of the problem is that global interest rates are artificially low, as inflation appears to be under control. As other asset classes price off interest rates, the entire financial pricing system appears out of kilter. To illustrate the ‘abnormality’: investors can currently buy a 10-year government bond in Germany and, if it’s held until maturity, they’ll be guaranteed a negative return of around 0.3% per annum.
The question is, with such abysmal return prospects, who in their right mind would opt for global bonds? Well, investors are indeed buying them, and the only way to explain this is that they’re now questioning the traditional risk-reward relationship associated with growth assets such as equities and listed property. Purchasing bonds implies that they’re more fearful of the risk or probability of losing money on equities and property than they are of a guaranteed negative return of 0.3% per year!
This is the dilemma we face: investors seeking out the most optimal asset allocation in their portfolios really are caught between a rock (bonds) and a hard place (equities and listed property). Over the longer term, equity returns will always trump those of bonds. However, recent history suggests the opposite, and when one considers that global economic growth momentum is showing clear signs of slowing down, an argument in favour of traditional financial laws becomes more challenging.
In South Africa, from a ‘top-down’ or macro-economic perspective, equity valuations in fact appear to be quite rational – and indeed more palatable than those of offshore equities. But looking at individual local shares, especially the so-called SA Inc companies – those that generate most of their earnings within our borders – it’s difficult to see significant earnings growth in our current economic environment, and therefore material share price upside, over the short term.
While opportunities are starting to open up in listed property as an asset class, particularly in South Africa, we remain cautious on the sector against a tough economic backdrop. Both here and abroad, the risk remains that rental income growth rates will come under pressure.
This leaves us with government bonds – the one asset class that has traditionally been viewed as a shock absorber providing protection against equity market shocks resulting in sell-offs. But as we’ve seen, investors buying this protection are guaranteed to lose money, and it’s hard to see bond yields declining materially from these levels (remember, when bond yields fall, bond prices appreciate).
Investors therefore have a tough call to make in an environment in which nothing stands out. In our view, the best course of action is to ensure a sensible blend of assets – taking into account both the macro-economic risks as well as the current asset class pricing dilemma.
In this unusual environment we don’t believe it’s wise or rational to employ aggressive asset allocation calls in our multi-asset portfolios. We still express our views on the margin, however. We’re now underweight in both global and local bonds – but we do still hold some bonds for their ‘buffer’ role in a portfolio in times of uncertainty.
It’s our view that financial markets currently dictate a more conservative cash position, so the cash portion in our portfolios is significant. Cash provides security, but it also offers optionality – to take advantage of opportunities that may arise in either the property or equity markets.
Taking a longer-term view, we’ll be looking to increase the offshore equity exposure in our multi-asset class portfolios, taking into account currency considerations as well as equity valuations. We’ll consider it prudent to migrate a portion of assets offshore at an exchange rate lower than R14 to the US dollar – and then only if equity prices are such that we see decent prospective investment outcomes for our clients.
It’s important to note that we won’t be changing our proven long-term approach when it comes to asset allocation. This approach has always been rooted in a solid base of research, insight and patience, seeking superior returns over the long term and avoiding the distraction of quick and perhaps unsustainable wins.
However, the aggressive movements in the prices of the various asset classes we’re currently experiencing do require us to be nimble – without sacrificing our long-term value considerations. We’ll therefore make use of these short-term opportunities – if the price is compelling – and carefully adjust our clients’ portfolios for better investment returns over the long term.
Sanlam Private Wealth manages a comprehensive range of multi-asset (balanced) and equity portfolios across different risk categories.
Our team of world-class professionals can design a personalised offshore investment strategy to help diversify your portfolio.
Our customised Shariah portfolios combine our investment expertise with the wisdom of an independent Shariah board comprising senior Ulama.
We collaborate with third-party providers to offer collective investments, private equity, hedge funds and structured products.
are they a good investment?
The great lockdown:
one year on
Head of Equities
IHG: focus on
quality pays off
Sanlam Active UK Fund
BUDGET 2021: THE RIGHT INTENT,
BUT RISKS ABOUND
Investment Economist at Sanlam Investments
INVESTING IN 2021:
WHAT TO EXPECT
Sanlam Private Wealth
MINING: IS THE
THROUGH THE HYPE
Head of Equities
Jack is back – business
as usual for Alibaba?
Global Equity Analyst, Sanlam UK
South AfricaSouth Africa Home Sanlam Investments Sanlam Private Wealth Glacier by Sanlam Sanlam BlueStar
Rest of AfricaSanlam Namibia Sanlam Mozambique Sanlam Tanzania Sanlam Uganda Sanlam Swaziland Sanlam Kenya Sanlam Zambia Sanlam Private Wealth Mauritius
GlobalGlobal Investment Solutions
Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2000/023234/07, is a licensed Financial Services Provider (FSP 37473), a registered Credit Provider (NCRCP1867) and a member of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (‘SPW’).
All reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate. The information does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of FAIS. Professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision.
Participation in Sanlam Private Wealth Portfolios is a medium to long-term investment. The value of portfolios is subject to fluctuation and past performance is not a guide to future performance. Calculations are based on a lump sum investment with gross income reinvested on the ex-dividend date. The net of fee calculation assumes a 1.15% annual management charge and total trading costs of 1% (both inclusive of VAT) on the actual portfolio turnover. Actual investment performance will differ based on the fees applicable, the actual investment date and the date of reinvestment of income. A schedule of fees and maximum commissions is available upon request.
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
The Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA. Collective investment schemes are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units / unit trusts may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the manager, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) Pty Ltd, a registered and approved manager in collective investment schemes in securities (‘Manager’).
Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in a portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of a portfolio and an investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, date of reinvestment of income and dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used.
The performance of portfolios depend on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-dividend date. Portfolios may invest in other unit trusts which levy their own fees and may result is a higher fee structure for Sanlam Private Wealth’s portfolios.
All portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No. 45 of 2002. Funds may from time to time invest in foreign countries and may have risks regarding liquidity, the repatriation of funds, political and macroeconomic situations, foreign exchange, tax, settlement, and the availability of information. The manager may close any portfolio to new investors in order to ensure efficient management according to applicable mandates.
The management of portfolios may be outsourced to financial services providers authorised in terms of FAIS.
TREATING CUSTOMERS FAIRLY (TCF)
As a business, Sanlam Private Wealth is committed to the principles of TCF, practicing a specific business philosophy that is based on client-centricity and treating customers fairly. Clients can be confident that TCF is central to what Sanlam Private Wealth does and can be reassured that Sanlam Private Wealth has a holistic wealth management product offering that is tailored to clients’ needs, and service that is of a professional standard.